![]() |
|
| English - français |
|
|
The focus of the telecentre research was the Northern Province, which had been identified by the Government of South Africa as a development priority area that was in dire need of communication services. Six telecentres in the area were selected for the study: Botlokwa, Phalala, Makuleke, Mankweng, Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo, and Thakgalane. The research was conducted between March and October 2000 and involved, in addition to 7–10 days of field research in each study site, a training workshop, and local and provincial feedback and dissemination workshops. Telecommunications contextSouth Africa has by far the largest number of fixed line (estimated to be 4.9 million in 2002) and mobile connections in Africa and the most advanced information and communication technology (ICT) sector on the continent with nearly three million Internet accounts in 2001. However, access to ICTs in South Africa tends to follow lines of existing inequalities, which are quite wide because of the legacy of apartheid. The Telecommunications Act was enacted in 1996 and declared universal access to telephony as the cornerstone of government policy. The Telecommunications Act created the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) in July 2000, which resulted from the merger of the South African Telecom Regulatory Authority (SATRA) and the Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA), as the telecommunications regulator. The Act also established the Universal Service Agency (USA) as the primary mechanism for the provision of access throughout the country. The main telecommunications operator is a former state-owned monopoly Telkom, which still has a monopoly on fixed lines. Telkom’s exclusivity and the introduction of a second network operator were effected by the Telecommunications Amendment Act of 2001. The government has introduced special licenses to small, medium and micro enterprises to operate Public Switched Telephone networks (PSTN) in rural areas. There were 2.1 million fixed lines in 2001 and 9 million mobile subscribers (BMI-Technologies 2002: 403) in the country. The cellular phone share of the market has grown rapidly in the last few years, with three providers being Vodacom, MTN, and the newly established Cell C. There are currently more mobile than fixed lines in South Africa, a situation similar to that in Uganda, Senegal and most of the continent. Other government departments and programmes also target ICTs, and several government initiatives are geared toward promoting ICTs. The Government Communications and Information Service, for example, has been involved in establishing ‘Multi-Purpose Community Centres’ for integrated government service delivery in disadvantaged areas and Schoolnet South Africa has projects in thousands of schools. The USA has largely focussed on setting up ICT centres, generally called telecentres and cyberlabs in South Africa. Twelve of the telecentres set up by USA in South Africa have been with assistance from IDRC. At the end of 2001, USA had established 81 telecentres in different parts of the country. The cost of establishing a telecentre in South Africa is said to be approximately ZAR 200,000 (USD 16,600). In most cases, the establishment process does not involve the construction of new buildings. The trend is to renovate existing buildings or shipping containers, make them secure, and paint them in the USA colours of white, purple, and green. Between one and four telephones are installed, and between two and five Pentium computers are set up. Most South African telecentres offer basic services such as telephone, photocopying, printing, and some word processing. Study sitesThe six telecentres that constituted the focus of this study are located in the Northern Province, which was chosen for several reasons:
USA selected the six study sites to ensure that both older and newer telecentres were included in the study. The older telecentres, established between 1998 and mid-1999 are: Botlokwa, Phalala, and Makuleke; whereas, the newer ones, established during 2000, are Mankweng, Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo, and Thakgalane. With the exception of the Mankweng telecentre, which is located in a township, all of the other telecentres selected for the study were either in rural (Phalala, Makuleke, and Thakgalane) or in semi-rural locations (Botlokwa and Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo).
FindingsOf the six telecentres, three were not operational at the time of the study. At the Mankweng Telecentre, theft of equipment barely a month after it was launched in February 2000, had paralysed operations. At Thakgalane, neither the required equipment (including a working phone line) had been received nor proper training been given to the staff at the time of the study. The Makuleke telecentre had ceased operations on account of a large unpaid phone bill. Consequently, discussions that follow are based largely on information from the telecentres in Phalala, Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo, and Botlokwa, which were operational at the time of the investigations. EquipmentThe ICTs available at the telecentres at the time of the study included computers, printers, facsimile machines, telephones, scanners, television sets, and video cassette recorders. Computers were the most common ICT equipment at the telecentres along with telephones, facsimile machines, and photocopiers. Botlokwa, with seven computers, had the highest number of computers, whereas the other telecentres each had four computers. With respect to telephones, Thakgalane was waiting to have six lines installed at the time of the study, Botlokwa had five lines, Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo had four lines, and Phalala had two lines. Telkom provided all telephone lines. Each telecentre had one photocopier and one facsimile machine. Services offeredThe equipment that was available at the telecentres reflected the services offered to community members. For example, in Botlokwa, photocopying was the service most frequently used by clients (49.1%) followed by telephone calls (28.3%), computer use (11.3%), and printing (9.4%). At Phalala, the pattern of use was different, with a majority of the clients making telephone calls (43.8%) and photocopying (14.6%); computer use and printing were not very popular, as only 6.3% of users requested each service. In Bakgaga, the telephone was most popular (47%), followed by photocopying (36%), facsimile service (9%), computer use (8%), and printing (4%). At Thakgalane, few services could be offered because of the absence of telephone lines. Some photocopying was done, and the available computers were not being used because of a software problem. The facsimile machine and printer at the centre were also not operational during the research period. Purpose of useThe research revealed that the telecentre services were used for a variety of purposes: for social and health reasons (Botlokwa, Phalala, Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo), for education and training (Botlokwa and Phalala), for business and government information (Botlokwa and Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo), and for employment, computer training, project hosting, funeral services, and local news (Botlokwa). In Mankweng, before the burglary, the centre used to provide typing services for students (for assignments) and for the preparation of resumes. The centre also helped teachers to design school schedules and community members to design business cards, greetings cards, and programs for weddings, funerals, parties, ceremonies, and social gatherings. There was no Internet connection in Mankweng even before the burglary. Phalala had developed a wider range of services than other telecentres. These services included a post office and a weekly home affairs service. Telecentre staff became more involved in providing information services because there had been no local newspaper or radio station. A team spearheaded by the telecentre staff had been organized to develop the first newspaper for the area. User profilesAt the Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo and Phalala telecentres the majority of users were between 17 and 40 years of age (73.0% in Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo and 88.7% in Phalala). The under-16 and over-40 age groups were not frequent participants in the activities of the two telecentres. There was a significant difference in the age profile of the users in Botlokwa, where 48% of the users were 26–40 years old and 32% were over 40 years old. No data were gathered on users below 25 years of age. Available gender data from the Botlokwa and Phalala telecentres did not reveal any consistent differences. At Botlokwa, gender disparity was minimal as 50.9% of the users were male and 49.1% were female. In Phalala, the gender gap was considerably wider with 42.2% male and 57.8% female. Although systematic data for Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo was not collected, the researchers observed that more females used the telephones. Information about the occupations of the users of the telecentres in Botlokwa and Phalala presented interesting insights. In Botlokwa, over 30% of the users were from the education sub-sector, labourers (e.g., domestic workers and taxi-drivers etc.) constituted 20.5%, and the unemployed, and government officials, each constituted about 10% of users. In Phalala, the unemployed constituted the largest proportion of the users (35%), and educators came a distant second (18%) followed by students (14%). In Mankweng, teachers and members of the business community mostly used photocopying services, and the facsimile machine was popular with students who needed to send urgent application forms and materials. Impediments to useA wide range of factors that hindered access and use of telecentre facilities and services were identified:
RelevanceIn general, various community groups contended that the telecentres help them to maintain contact and communications with family members and friends. The telecentres had also impacted on distances that had to be travelled in search of similar services located elsewhere. Schools in Botlokwa heavily used the telephones, facsimile machines, photocopiers, and computers for word processing. Other organizations, however, felt that the telecentre in Botlokwa was being badly run. A member of the Youth Club said: ‘this is the first opportunity for us to make inputs regarding the telecentre . . . it has been run like a private company and is not serving the youth . . .’ Many other organizations voiced unhappiness with the way the telecentre was being run. A lack of consultation was reported, and it was perceived that the telecentre was enriching individuals rather than benefiting the community. In Phalala, all those interviewed were overwhelmingly positive about the telecentre and saw it as a sign of progress and development in the area. A member of the burial society stated: ‘as a community, we are impressed by the services the telecentre is offering.’ The Mankweng community felt that the centre should develop new services, such as a community newsletter, become a local information centre, and initiate training in computers and other skills. Ownership, management, and sustainabilityThe telecentres were ‘owned’ by various groups and associations, although it was not clear what ownership actually meant to the respondents because the USA had set up telecentres using a franchise model. The Phalala telecentre was owned by a local civic organization, part of the South African National Civic Organization (SANCO), and was housed in a building donated by the council in the grounds of the sports stadium. The telecentre was run by a staff of three and made a profit of about ZAR 2,000 (USD 166) each month. The income was banked regularly and managed by SANCO. Some of the money was invested in equipment (a camera) so that the telecentre could offer that service thought to be highly profitable. The community through the tribal authority, which had established a nine-member board to direct the activities of the telecentre, owned the Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo telecentre. The Thakgalane telecentre had a very competent and energetic manager, and was supported by the wider community. The Makuleke telecentre was owned by the people of Makuleke and run by a manager and a group of volunteers. The six-member Board of Directors, which was charged with responsibility for ensuring the survival and sustainability of the telecentre, was reported to be weak and unresponsive to the problems of the telecentre. The Mankweng telecentre was attached to a day-care centre and community library. It is owned and managed by the women’s committee that ran the day-care centre. The telecentre was well managed, although because Mankweng had many telephones and computer training facilities, the telecentre had competition and the services were consequently not in great demand. The Botlokwa Communications Awareness Forum owned the Botlokwa telecentre. The community was represented on an eight-member management committee, which met monthly to oversee the running of the centre and make decisions on day-to-day activities. The research indicated that there was on-going tension as some people felt the telecentre was being run for individual profit rather than as a development project. During the provincial workshop that was held as part of the evaluation process to mark the end of the research cycle, suggestions were made of ways to guarantee the success and sustainability of the telecentres:
ConclusionThe aim of the research was to collect information that would help local telecentre managers to improve the relevance and sustainability of their telecentres. It was also expected that a learning system would be developed to support self-assessment and evaluation. There were some signs that this was happening in Phalala and Bakgaga-ba-Mothapo. In both these telecentres, the research led to wider community involvement in management decisions and to greater community commitment to the telecentre. In Botlokwa, the research raised community tensions between the telecentre management and other organizations in the community. In Makuleke, the research revealed a real local need, and the dire consequences of incompetent management (in this case, the near collapse of the telecentre). In Thakgalane and Mankweng, the research highlighted problems that were not directly under the control of local actors, such as non-delivery of equipment and inappropriate choice of sites. The results presented in this chapter suggest that although the establishment of a successful telecentre is not easy when there is local commitment, a clear and determined focus, and the necessary equipment and skills, sustainability and positive impacts can be found within the communities brought about by the telecentres. The success of Phalala community TC provides some support and preliminary evidence for the evolutionary thesis of telecentre development. As the first USA TC started in 1998, it can be said and seen to be in the user-fee independent phase. |
||||||||||||
| guest (Leer)(Ottawa) Login | Inicio|Empleos|Derechos de autor y uso|Información general|Contáctenos|Ancho de banda bajo |