![]() |
|
| français |
|
|
Every International Women’s Day, we pause and celebrate the progress already made toward equality and justice for women and girls. The occasion also reminds us that fighting for women’s rights is not a seasonal effort, but is a year-round and long-term challenge. Gender matters. Whether you are female or male may influence your chances of going to school, of choosing your own spouse, of finding a decent job, of starting a business, or getting into politics. IDRC recognizes that equality for girls and women is critical to development efforts. If the talents and energy of half the world’s people are squandered, everybody pays a price. IDRC has always confronted this kind of prejudice as a crosscutting theme in all its support for research. In 2006 IDRC added a clear focus to its programming by creating its Women’s Rights and Citizenship program to support research that addresses the needs of poor and marginalized women and that engages meaningfully in policy debates. Our goal remains to achieve a world where all women are first-class citizens and equal partners in development and decision-making — the whole year round. Maureen O'Neil The Landscape of Land Tenure
In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights upheld the right of women to own land and property. In the years since, the calls for equity in tenure have become more frequent and the voices louder, yet women’s access to and control over land and other natural resources continue to be limited in many parts of the world. This, in turn, restricts their access to credit and to power. There are many reasons why legislation has been largely ineffective: conflicts between land tenure and other laws, weak institutions to enforce laws and protect women’s rights, and customary practices that are biased against women, among others. Most rural women also lack the education, time, or funds to fight for their rights. Recognizing the importance of the issue, in 2005 IDRC commissioned a series of scoping studies to identify gaps in research on women’s access. The studies focused on reviews of the nexus between gender and land tenure in sub-regions across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In addition to examining the gender, social, and power relations that govern tenure, the studies reviewed research capacities and analyzed the key elements of research agendas in each region. As a follow-up, a project is being developed to probe more deeply in a number of countries to recommend policy interventions and practical ways of supporting women’s secure access to land.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Beyond Victims and Villains Why have HIV and AIDS prevention efforts in southern Africa failed to produce the expected results? An answer may be emerging from research supported by IDRC since 1997 when the non-governmental research organization CIET focused on what it called “male resilience” in the prevention of sexual violence: why some men do not rape. The findings surprised researchers. Many participants in south Johannesburg, the location of the research project, considered rape to be normal, almost expected. In 2002/2003, IDRC and UNICEF supported CIET’s national survey of school children, which confirmed the idea of a “culture of sexual violence” running through South African society. Many young participants did not believe that condoms could protect them against HIV; most would not discuss their HIV status with their families; and one in every 10 said they would deliberately spread HIV if they ever contracted it. Victims of sexual abuse were much more likely to express these views. With around 10% of school children forced to have sex every year, this is worrying for AIDS prevention. IDRC-supported CIET research in South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, and Botswana (2004–2007) showed that some people have very limited ability to adopt prevention measures. For example, nearly one third of women said they could not insist on condom use, although they suspected their partner might be infected. Dr Neil Andersson, who led CIET’s research, describes these women as “choice disabled.” “The one in three who is perhaps most vulnerable to HIV infection is unable to act on prevention decisions. As a human rights issue, this is appalling and will frustrate efforts to control the epidemic. We should think about this as a reservoir of HIV infection that is missed entirely by current AIDS prevention strategies.” |
| guest (Read)(Ottawa) Login | Home|Careers|Copyright and Terms of Use|General Infomation|Contact Us|Low bandwidth |